The Israeli and Palestinian conflict is a very hot topic. Many usually have a biased opinion before they even bother to look at the other side because that's what they've been taught. In United States we see much pro-Israeli media and financial support (something like 10+ billion a year) probably for what is called Zionism.
As a Latter-day Saint growing up I often heard from Sunday School and Seminary teachers that we need to support the Jews because they will be on the right side. What side were they talking about? Now that I have been studying the Middle East and its modern and past issues for the last 4 years at Brigham Young University, I have seen that much of those teachings were only the teachers' opinions, not actual church doctrine. Official church doctrine and opinione are two very BIG differences because one is concrete and we should follow, the other is just commentary that we just don't know if it is true or not (and nor does it make a difference in our eternal progression here on earth).
Below is a portion of an address given by my professor James Toronto and his wife at a BYU Women's Conference in 2001:
I believe with what President Hunter stated, "we have love for and an interest in each" because guess what? We have a love and interest in everyone on that lives on this earth, no matter what religion or ethnicity. I read an article given to me by a friend who studied at the BYU Jerusalem Center written by a member of the LDS church in a Hebrew/English newspaper. He stated in this newspaper that any Mormon that supports Palestine does not understand what it means to be a good standing member of the church. I commented on his article stating that his facts with the conflict were correct but that his statement of not being a good standing member of the church was incorrect.
Let it be clear that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not condemn one over the other because of their religious affiliation (there are many Christians in Palestine that have been there since the time of Christ). The church does not support any such opinion that one is more righteous than the other, that we need to choose which side to be on, or that Judaism will be the victor over the Muslims. These opinions are simply just those, opinions.
My opinion?
Both are at fault when it comes to the conflict. Both need to learn to love each other. And my Sunday School and Seminary teachers were ignorant in this area for teaching false church doctrine.
Do I support one side over the other?
No, I believe the oppressed deserve to have an equal voice.
Do I feel my testimony has been shaken because of these opinions that I've been taught? Absolutely not. There are no hard feelings towards them and my testimony of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ is even more firm through experience and prayer.
As a Latter-day Saint growing up I often heard from Sunday School and Seminary teachers that we need to support the Jews because they will be on the right side. What side were they talking about? Now that I have been studying the Middle East and its modern and past issues for the last 4 years at Brigham Young University, I have seen that much of those teachings were only the teachers' opinions, not actual church doctrine. Official church doctrine and opinione are two very BIG differences because one is concrete and we should follow, the other is just commentary that we just don't know if it is true or not (and nor does it make a difference in our eternal progression here on earth).
Below is a portion of an address given by my professor James Toronto and his wife at a BYU Women's Conference in 2001:
" My third and final example of how a skewed understanding of doctrine can lead to unkind attitudes and behavior is close to my heart and personal experience. For the past 25 years in my work in the Middle East, I have read and heard expressed many times the view that LDS teachings about the gathering of Israel and the establishment of Zion imply that the Church supports the Jews in their struggle with the Palestinians and other Arabs in the Holy Land. There is not time today to discuss adequately why this is an inaccurate interpretation of LDS doctrine and a misrepresentation of the Church’s stance on this extremely complex international political issue. Suffice it to say for now that LDS authors, speakers, teachers, and celebrities who advocate and perpetuate these views are not official spokespersons for the church, even though they are often perceived and cited as such. Many times over the years I have had conversations with Arabs and Muslims, including many students at BYU, who are friends of the Church but, having read this popular LDS literature about the Middle East conflict, are deeply troubled by what appears to be strong bias in favor of Israel. Some of these unofficial and inflammatory LDS writings have even appeared in Arab newspapers in the Middle East purporting to represent the Mormon view on this issue. This problem is especially painful for members of the Church who are Arab (and they are numerous, active, committed, many having served missions and been endowed in the temple) who love the Gospel but are greatly perplexed and saddened when they encounter attitudes among fellow members that reflect a pro-Israeli, anti-Arab prejudice.
Those who do speak officially for the Church–the First Presidency and the Twelve– have never expressed support for one side over another. On the contrary, they have exhibited scrupulous impartiality in all their utterances and actions dealing with the Middle East crisis, and have sought tirelessly to build strong relations with both Jews and Arabs in an effort to bring about greater peace and stability in the region. Elder Howard W. Hunter, who had in-depth understanding of Middle Eastern issues, once addressed this concern in a talk at BYU:
As members of the Lord’s church, we need to
lift our vision beyond personal prejudices. We need to discover the supreme
truth that indeed our Father is no respecter of persons. Sometimes we unduly
offend brothers and sisters of other nations by assigning exclusiveness to one
nationality of people over another. Let me cite, as an example of
exclusiveness, the present problem in the Middle East–the conflict between the
Arabs and the Jews. . . . Both the Jews and the Arabs are children of our
Father. They are both children of promise, and as a church we do not take
sides. We have love for and an interest in each.[i] "
Toronto, James and Diane. “No More Strangers and Foreigners.” In Ye
Shall Bear Record of Me: Talks from the 2001 BYU Women’s Conference. Salt
Lake City: Bookcraft, 2002.
I believe with what President Hunter stated, "we have love for and an interest in each" because guess what? We have a love and interest in everyone on that lives on this earth, no matter what religion or ethnicity. I read an article given to me by a friend who studied at the BYU Jerusalem Center written by a member of the LDS church in a Hebrew/English newspaper. He stated in this newspaper that any Mormon that supports Palestine does not understand what it means to be a good standing member of the church. I commented on his article stating that his facts with the conflict were correct but that his statement of not being a good standing member of the church was incorrect.
Let it be clear that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not condemn one over the other because of their religious affiliation (there are many Christians in Palestine that have been there since the time of Christ). The church does not support any such opinion that one is more righteous than the other, that we need to choose which side to be on, or that Judaism will be the victor over the Muslims. These opinions are simply just those, opinions.
My opinion?
Both are at fault when it comes to the conflict. Both need to learn to love each other. And my Sunday School and Seminary teachers were ignorant in this area for teaching false church doctrine.
Do I support one side over the other?
No, I believe the oppressed deserve to have an equal voice.
Do I feel my testimony has been shaken because of these opinions that I've been taught? Absolutely not. There are no hard feelings towards them and my testimony of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ is even more firm through experience and prayer.
[i].
Howard W. Hunter, “All Are Alike Unto God,” BYU
Speeches of the Year, 1979, pp. 35-36.