Showing posts with label Correct Doctrine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Correct Doctrine. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Same-Sex Marriage and Sustaining the Prophet

Given recent events I feel that even my own faith is split when it comes to equal rights towards same-sex marriage.

As a Latter-day Saint, we believe in prophets of old from ancient times and prophets that live today. The prophet today has the same power and authority that prophets like Moses and Abraham had. These men are sustained by members of the LDS faith. To sustain means to support them in their positions even if it may seem hard at times. We've been promised eternal blessings as we follow the prophet. That prophet today is Thomas S. Monson along with his two counselors and 12 apostles.

Prop 8 for California occurred while I was on my mission in Seattle, Washington. What a time it was to be a missionary! I recall hearing the letter from the first presidency over the pulpit stating the church's stance on gay marriage and asking all members to do what they could to support the cause of Prop 8. We had ex and inactive members of the church seek us out as they saw us in public places to make sure we knew that our church was lying and cheating when it came to its actions towards gays and lesbians. Of course, being a full-time missionary, you sometimes feel like you are living underneath a rock when it comes to political events because you don't read the newspapers or watch the news (it's part of missionary rules to help them focus on preaching the gospel). So when these people came to us, I was slightly shocked at how angry they were because of not fully understanding the details they were talking about but also the disgust they had towards the church leaders. I recall one sister while we were at her door trying to invite her back to church, she was so frustrated with the church's stance on gay marriage that she almost threw her glass of wine at me. I hate to admit that we even received a few lectures from active members of the church on how the church leadership was wrong to make such statements. We also found much success in Seattle because of the opposition. Many more joined the church that yea in our tiny mission of Seattle, in fact more than double the converts were reported than the year previous. Blessings come from following the prophet.
Kent Zone, Washington Seattle Mission

"Those who listen to and follow the counsel of living prophets and apostles will not go astray. The teachings of living prophets provide an anchor of eternal truth in a world of shifting values and help us avoid misery and sorrow. The confusion and strife of the world will not overwhelm us, and we can enjoy the assurance of being in harmony with God’s will." Preach My Gospel, section "Follow the Prophet"

The church has stated many times its position towards gay marriage. In short, the church claims gay sexual acts are no different than sexual intimacy between a man and a woman before marriage which is considered a sin. Marriage is ordained of God between a man and a woman and supports laws that do not allow gay marriage. The church does not hate the sinners but rather condemns the sin. View church's news statement regarding this issue.


Why do I oppose same-sex marriage?
I have gay family members, study the Middle East which is a place of very little human rights; so helping the cause of equality in same-sex marriage feels very natural to do but those are not reasons good enough to turn me away from following my leaders. I believe that prophets are the spokesmen for Christ as if He were here on earth. I whole heartily believe in my Savior and believe that a prophet of God speaks for Him. I sustain him in all of his prophetic annunciations. As the church states, I have profound love for those that desire same-sex marriage even though I oppose the rulings in favor of it. I believe that God in His own wisdom knows what He is doing even though it doesn't always make sense to us.

To quote a friend's testimony:


"A prophet is a representative of Jesus Christ. He's the spokesman of He who is at the head of this church. Please don't give lectures on principles you don't understand. Surely, the Lord and his spokesman who He has called and authorized know more about matters of salvation and agency than you do. Read the scriptures and study their teachings. Read church history and study its principle stories. There are countless occasions when the Lord has asked his people to do something that they didn't fully understand or went completely against their personal logic and reasoning. But in following the Lord's spokesman, even during those times when that revelation has to be followed solely on faith, we don't just simply show obedience to the Lord's spokesman but to the Lord himself. A prophet is simply a conduit of the Lord's will. Following that counsel shows our obedience to Christ himself."


It seems just like on my mission, some members of the church no matter where you go are for same-sex marriage. Claims towards equality and free agency is important but I wonder why then the church has come out yesterday regarding it's position towards the future ruling from the Supreme Court, reiterating their stance on marriage between a man and a woman. I in no way mean to cause disrespect towards these members that support same-sex marriage. Many feel very passionately towards equality because of their own beliefs of loving one another. This to me is respectful. But I fear that there is a mark being missed, the sustaining of our prophet, seer, and revelator.

Isn't this what a prophet is for? To help us in our current needs? Noah warned of a flood, those who listened were blessed and those who didn't...well sort of missed the boat (no pun intended). Just as today, Latter-day Saints believe a prophet is to help guide us in our day to day lives as Satan's power try to influence us one way or the other. I do not mean to say to those that ignore the church's stance are going to go apostate, or leave the church, they still are good great members of the gospel. I do fear though that they may end up wanting to throw wine at me like the lady at the door on my mission after reading this post, seeing that the church will not change its stance on same-sex attractions and quite literally any sin. A sin is sin. Doctrine is doctrine.

Free Agency is a topic that is approached as well. One other friend described her understanding of which I agree with:

"I just want to say one thing concerning agency because there are a few people who mentioned how God wants us to have agency. The agency we received is called moral agency. It is the ability to choose what we ought and NOT the ability to choose whatever we want at the time. In addition, if I'm not mistaken, the adversary's plan was not to take away agency, but to take away accountability. Agency requires opposition, but under the adversary's plan there would not have been opposition and therefore no agency. As such, none of us would have been able to learn or progress in this life."

What about those who are non-LDS and living this lifestyle? How should we react to their choices?

"You have to be careful not to turn agency into relativism, which is when people believe that truths are just products of society and that there are no universal ones. The problem with saying that certain things are bad for one group but okay for others is that it suggests that those principles are relative and up to individual interpretation. Just as God either exists or He does not, the things he says either are truth and, thus, universal, or they are not. And if God exists, then they are universal truths and it doesn't matter what religion one belongs in, or if someone is religious or not." 

I know I have probably created enemies inside and outside of the church. I hate that aspect of sharing one's own feelings and testimony. I do not condemn the desires of others but I'd rather be a voice of truth when truth is spoken. I hope that this has been a cordial and respectful approach towards this topic for those inside and outside of the LDS faith, namely those who of a different opinion.

We must thank God in all that we have and not fear. I am engaged to be married to someone I never thought I could love as much as I do. No matter what outcome may be of this world, same-sex marriage or not, I know that Lauren and I will live the Gospel to the fullest, teach our children righteous principles, and encourage others in the world to do the same. I know that my Savior lives and He leads the church through his vessel, Thomas Monson. The direction of the church in this stance I believe is to be God's doctrine, not homophobia or hatred.


Below you will find statements and interviews of the church on the same-sex attraction and marriage:

The Divine Institution of Marriage







The LDS Church also has a webpage just for the understanding and official feelings and support of those with same-gender attraction. www.mormonsandgays.org
 "At some point, it is no longer about what you think is right. At some point, you have to be humble enough to accept that the Lord's ways are higher than our ways. If the prophet has received revelation from God that it is important for the state to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, who are any of us to question Him who knows all things. This is the beginning, but God already sees the end. Trust Him."

Friday, January 13, 2012

The Mormon Church and the Israeli Palestinian Conflict

The Israeli and Palestinian conflict is a very hot topic. Many usually have a biased opinion before they even bother to look at the other side because that's what they've been taught. In United States we see much pro-Israeli media and financial support (something like 10+ billion a year) probably for what is called Zionism.



As a Latter-day Saint growing up I often heard from Sunday School and Seminary teachers that we need to support the Jews because they will be on the right side. What side were they talking about? Now that I have been studying the Middle East and its modern and past issues for the last 4 years at Brigham Young University, I have seen that much of those teachings were only the teachers' opinions, not actual church doctrine. Official church doctrine and opinione are two very BIG differences because one is concrete and we should follow, the other is just commentary that we just don't know if it is true or not (and nor does it make a difference in our eternal progression here on earth). 

Below is a portion of an address given by my professor James Toronto and his wife at a BYU Women's Conference in 2001:

" My third and final example of how a skewed understanding of doctrine can lead to unkind attitudes and behavior is close to my heart and personal experience. For the past 25 years in my work in the Middle East, I have read and heard expressed many times the view that LDS teachings about the gathering of Israel and the establishment of Zion imply that the Church supports the Jews in their struggle with the Palestinians and other Arabs in the Holy Land. There is not time today to discuss adequately why this is an inaccurate interpretation of LDS doctrine and a misrepresentation of the Church’s stance on this extremely complex international political issue. Suffice it to say for now that LDS authors, speakers, teachers, and celebrities who advocate and perpetuate these views are not official spokespersons for the church, even though they are often perceived and cited as such. Many times over the years I have had conversations with Arabs and Muslims, including many students at BYU, who are friends of the Church but, having read this popular LDS literature about the Middle East conflict, are deeply troubled by what appears to be strong bias in favor of Israel. Some of these unofficial and inflammatory LDS writings have even appeared in Arab newspapers in the Middle East purporting to represent the Mormon view on this issue. This problem is especially painful for members of the Church who are Arab (and they are numerous, active, committed, many having served missions and been endowed in the temple) who love the Gospel but are greatly perplexed and saddened when they encounter attitudes among fellow members that reflect a pro-Israeli, anti-Arab prejudice.
            Those who do speak officially for the Church–the First Presidency and the Twelve– have never expressed support for one side over another. On the contrary, they have exhibited scrupulous impartiality in all their utterances and actions dealing with the Middle East crisis, and have sought tirelessly to build strong relations with both Jews and Arabs in an effort to bring about greater peace and stability in the region. Elder Howard W. Hunter, who had in-depth understanding of Middle Eastern issues, once addressed this concern in a talk at BYU:

As members of the Lord’s church, we need to lift our vision beyond personal prejudices. We need to discover the supreme truth that indeed our Father is no respecter of persons. Sometimes we unduly offend brothers and sisters of other nations by assigning exclusiveness to one nationality of people over another. Let me cite, as an example of exclusiveness, the present problem in the Middle East–the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews. . . . Both the Jews and the Arabs are children of our Father. They are both children of promise, and as a church we do not take sides. We have love for and an interest in each.[i] "


Toronto, James and Diane. “No More Strangers and Foreigners.” In Ye Shall Bear Record of Me: Talks from the 2001 BYU Women’s Conference. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 2002.


 I believe with what President Hunter stated, "we have love for and an interest in each" because guess what? We have a love and interest in everyone on that lives on this earth, no matter what religion or ethnicity. I read an article given to me by a friend who studied at the BYU Jerusalem Center written by a member of the LDS church in a Hebrew/English newspaper. He stated in this newspaper that any Mormon that supports Palestine does not understand what it means to be a good standing member of the church. I commented on his article stating that his facts with the conflict were correct but that his statement of not being a good standing member of the church was incorrect.

Let it be clear that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not condemn one over the other because of their religious affiliation (there are many Christians in Palestine that have been there since the time of Christ). The church does not support any such opinion that one is more righteous than the other, that we need to choose which side to be on, or that Judaism will be the victor over the Muslims. These opinions are simply just those, opinions.

My opinion?
Both are at fault when it comes to the conflict. Both need to learn to love each other. And my Sunday School and Seminary teachers were ignorant in this area for teaching false church doctrine.

Do I support one side over the other?
No, I believe the oppressed deserve to have an equal voice.

Do I feel my testimony has been shaken because of these opinions that I've been taught? Absolutely not. There are no hard feelings towards them and my testimony of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ is even more firm through experience and prayer.


[i]. Howard W. Hunter, “All Are Alike Unto God,” BYU Speeches of the Year, 1979, pp. 35-36.